Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[22PacRimLPolyJ141] Colombia’s Poetic World of Authors’ Moral Rights: Considerations on Imprisoning a Professor for Plagiarism

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rubio, Carlos Castellanos
dc.contributor.author Cromwell, David (translator)
dc.date 2013-01
dc.date.accessioned 2013-02-19T16:34:34Z
dc.date.available 2013-02-19T16:34:34Z
dc.date.issued 2013-01
dc.identifier.citation 22 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 141 (2013) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1066-8632
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1211
dc.description.abstract Carlos Castellanos Rubio, Attorney, Rubio Oramas & Asociados. Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Los Andes (Bogotá); Graduate 2009, University of Stockholm, LLM, 2013. Abstract: The following is a translation of Carlos Castellanos Rubio’s article in the June 2011 edition of La Revista de Derecho, Comunicaciones y Nuevas Tecnologías, a Colombian legal periodical. The article discusses a 2010 Colombian Supreme Court of Justice decision that sentenced Professor Luz Mary Giraldo to two years in prison plus monetary and civil sanctions for plagiarizing a student’s thesis, “The Poetic World of Giovanni Quessep.” The decision has been controversial in Colombia for a variety of reasons, and many have accused the Court of judicial activism. Much of this criticism stems from the Court convicting Giraldo of violating the student’s moral right to publish, or not publish, her “unpublished” work, based on an expansive reading of that statute. These critics have pointed out that the student’s work was published, and sitting in her university’s library. Others have decried the severity of the sentence, as it is the first criminal moral rights conviction in Colombian history. In this article, Mr. Castellanos explains how the Court based its decision on a broad interpretation of the personhood theory of copyright, without any discussion of the theory itself or its alternatives. He then suggests potential problems with the Court’s perspective; namely, that it might grant monopolies on unoriginal expressions and ideas, and thus stifle free expression. As a solution, the article proposes that Colombian judges develop and/or adapt analytical tools for filtering out a work’s unprotectable elements from the original, protectable elements, focusing on the idea/expression dichotomy. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Translation en_US
dc.title [22PacRimLPolyJ141] Colombia’s Poetic World of Authors’ Moral Rights: Considerations on Imprisoning a Professor for Plagiarism en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright © 2012 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law

Advanced Search


My Account