Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[8WashJLTech&Arts587] Update Needed? Digital Downloaders and the Innocent Infringer Defense

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Conerton, Colin
dc.contributor.author Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
dc.date.accessioned 2013-05-22T15:38:12Z
dc.date.available 2013-05-22T15:38:12Z
dc.date.issued 2013-05
dc.identifier.citation 8 WASH. J.L. TECH.& ARTS 587 (2013) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2157-2534
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1243
dc.description Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, Volume 8, Issue 5, Spring 2013 en_US
dc.description.abstract Abstract: Over the past decade, the music industry has suffered unprecedented piracy and digital music has become increasingly prevalent on illegal websites. In response, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has filed lawsuits against many alleged copyright infringers who have illegally downloaded music from the Internet. A few of these alleged infringers, in an effort to reduce damages, claimed they were “innocent infringers.” Several courts ruled that the innocent infringer defense did not apply, based on 17 U.S.C. § 402(d), which precludes the defense if proper copyright notice appears on “phonorecords” (e.g., compact discs). The Supreme Court denied certiorari in one such case, Harper v. Maverick Recording Co., but Justice Samuel Alito filed a dissent, arguing that certiorari should have been granted to address whether notice published on phonorecords applies to copyright infringement cases involving music downloaded from the Internet. Justice Alito’s dissent raises an important question: should the innocent infringer defense be unavailable as a matter of law in music downloading cases if copyright notice is available on physical media to which the downloaders may never have had access. This Article explores this issue by examining Justice Alito’s dissent and considering whether the Court should address the applicability of § 402(d) in music downloading cases. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Intellectual Property en_US
dc.title [8WashJLTech&Arts587] Update Needed? Digital Downloaders and the Innocent Infringer Defense en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright 2013 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account