Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[9WashJLTech&Arts019]Conformity in Confusion: Applying a Common Analysis to Wikipedia-based Jury Misconduct

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fredrickson, Matthew
dc.contributor.author Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
dc.date.accessioned 2013-08-15T21:41:10Z
dc.date.available 2013-08-15T21:41:10Z
dc.date.issued 2013-08
dc.identifier.citation 9 WASH. J.L. TECH.& ARTS en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2157-2534
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1268
dc.description.abstract Abstract: In 2012, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decidedUnited States v. Lawson, a case of first impression about a juror’s use of Wikipedia during deliberations. Had this case been decided in the 1950s, the juror’s contact with the extra-record material during deliberations would have given rise to a presumption of prejudice in favor of the party claiming he was denied a fair trial. However, in the 1980s and 1990s, the United States Supreme Court seemed to eliminate that presumption and place the burden of proving prejudice on the party seeking a new trial. As a result, federal circuit courts today disagree as to when, if at all, the moving party should enjoy a presumption of prejudice in such cases. But every federal circuit court’s substantive analysis focuses on the nature and impact of the extra-record contact, regardless of whether the presumption applies. This common substantive analysis has been used in Internet-based misconduct cases and should be expected in Wikipedia-based misconduct cases. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Litigation en_US
dc.title [9WashJLTech&Arts019]Conformity in Confusion: Applying a Common Analysis to Wikipedia-based Jury Misconduct en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright 2013 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account