Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[24 WashIntlLJ0589] Who Leads in a G-Zero World? Multi-Nationals, Sustainable Development, and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Changing Global Order

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sharma, Avi
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-16T21:01:26Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-16T21:01:26Z
dc.date.issued 2015-06
dc.identifier.citation 24 WASH. INT'L. L.J. 589 (2015) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2377-0872
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1499
dc.description Washington International Law Journal, Volume 24, Number 3, June 2015 en_US
dc.description.abstract Abstract: The UN Sustainable Development Goals (“SDGs”) aim to create a more peaceful, just, and environmentally sustainable global community. The SDGs target seventeen areas that demand immediate action by the international community, including the eradication of poverty, gender equality, climate change mitigation, and resilience building. Unfortunately, the world’s most powerful nation-state actors are unlikely to make the costly investments required to achieve the goals laid out in this ambitious UN document. In fact, this article argues that nation-state actors have powerful disincentives to play a leadership role in advancing the SDGs. The question then becomes: if nation-states are unable or unwilling to make these investments, who will? This article shows that Multinational Corporations (“MNCs”) have a unique capacity to address critical global challenges—not because they are more efficient, agile, or altruistic than other kinds of institutional actors. Rather, MNCs have the potential to make an impact on issues from gender equality to sustainable development because they have a different incentive structure than nation-state actors. Unlike nation-states that answer to constituencies that are fundamentally parochial in their outlook, MNCs answer to stakeholders who are disposed toward more—rather than less—global engagement. More specifically, this article analyzes the incentives that MNCs have to invest in the SDGs. It does not attempt to resolve political and ethical questions raised by the privatization of the intergovernmental responsibility to protect human and natural resources on a global scale. It does argue that in the face of critical global challenges, this private sector intervention is preferable to government inaction. en_US
dc.language
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Washington International Law Journal Association, University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, Washington en_US
dc.subject Article en_US
dc.title [24 WashIntlLJ0589] Who Leads in a G-Zero World? Multi-Nationals, Sustainable Development, and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Changing Global Order en_US
dc.title.alternative Who Leads in a G-Zero World? Multi-Nationals, Sustainable Development, and Corporate Social Responsibility in a Changing Global Order en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Compilation © 2015 Washington International Law Journal Association en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account