Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

Approximating a Federal Patent District Court After TC Heartland

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hsieh, Timothy T.
dc.date.accessioned 2018-04-12T15:02:32Z
dc.date.available 2018-04-12T15:02:32Z
dc.date.issued 2018-04
dc.identifier.citation 13 WASH. J.L. TECH.& ARTS 141 (2018) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2157-2534
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1787
dc.description.abstract This article presents a patent litigation framework for other federal district courts to follow, using the example of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas after TC Heartland. This article also provides an overview of the TC Heartland U.S. Supreme Court case and the In Re Cray Federal Circuit opinion, as well as how those two cases have impacted patent litigation in various district courts across the country, most notably in the District of Delaware. All district courts should learn various lessons from the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas and should model their practices after its approach to handling patent cases going forward. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Constitutional & Regulatory en_US
dc.title Approximating a Federal Patent District Court After TC Heartland en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder © Timothy T. Hsieh en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account