Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[2ShidlerJLComTech001] Defining Spyware: Necessary or Dangerous

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce and Technology
dc.contributor.author Braff, Andrew T.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-05-28T17:48:12Z
dc.date.available 2010-05-28T17:48:12Z
dc.date.issued 2005-08-12
dc.identifier.citation 2 Shidler J. L. Com. & Tech. 1 (Aug.12, 2005) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1547-0695
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/365
dc.description.abstract Abstract: State legislation attempting to define and proscribe spyware has been criticized for either being under-inclusive or over-inclusive. This article provides an overview of the technology that is commonly considered spyware and examines the potential effects of attempting to legislatively define and curtail spyware as a specific technology. It concludes that a more appropriate method to regulate spyware would focus on prohibiting conduct associated with placing monitoring software on a computer and enforcing existing law regarding such conduct. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce and Technology, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Corporate & Commercial en_US
dc.title [2ShidlerJLComTech001] Defining Spyware: Necessary or Dangerous en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright 2005 by Andrew T. Braff en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account