Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[4ShidlerJLComTech006] Admitting Computer Record Evidence after In Re Vinhnee: A Stricter Standard for the Future?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce and Technology
dc.contributor.author Offenbecher, Cooper
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-03T22:49:53Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-03T22:49:53Z
dc.date.issued 2007-10-17
dc.identifier.citation 4 Shidler J. L. Com. & Tech. 6 (Oct.17, 2007) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1547-0695
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/407
dc.description.abstract Abstract: In re Vinhnee, a Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel decision, employed Edward Imwinkelried’s eleven-step foundation process for authenticating computer records. In employing the eleven-step process, the Vinhnee court articulated a stricter standard than has previously been used by most courts for admitting computer records into evidence. This Article will first consider the various foundation standards that courts have applied to computer records. Next, the Article will analyze the Vinhnee standard, consider its elements, and compare it to the previous standards and commentary. Finally, the Article will conclude that the Vinhnee approach reflects common concerns by courts and commentators, and may influence other jurisdictions. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Shidler Journal of Law, Commerce and Technology, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Litigation en_US
dc.title [4ShidlerJLComTech006] Admitting Computer Record Evidence after In Re Vinhnee: A Stricter Standard for the Future? en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright 2007 by Cooper Offenbecher en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account