Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[85WashLRev0493] Procedural Rules under Washington’s Public Records Act: The Case for Agency Discretion

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Richard, William D
dc.contributor.author Washington Law Review
dc.date.accessioned 2010-09-14T16:58:20Z
dc.date.available 2010-09-14T16:58:20Z
dc.date.issued 2010-08
dc.identifier.citation 85 Wash. L. Rev. 493 (2010) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0043-0617
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/471
dc.description 24 p. en_US
dc.description.abstract Abstract: Voters adopted Washington’s Public Records Act (PRA) in 1972 as part of a broader ballot measure to enhance openness in state government. The PRA requires state government agencies, including statewide agencies and municipalities, to establish procedures so that the public can request copies of records agencies generate. The PRA exempts certain records from disclosure, and other statutes and case law supply additional exemptions. When an agency refuses to disclose records, the requester may ask a court to determine whether an exemption applies. If no exemption applies, the court may compel disclosure of the records and impose monetary penalties against the non-compliant agency, including attorney fees. Under the PRA, courts review denials de novo and in light of legislative intent, erring on the side of broad public access. In addition to reviewing denials, courts have recently been asked to consider whether an agency’s procedural rules under the PRA are reasonable. In analyzing procedural rules, some courts have applied the same broad interpretation used for substantive PRA questions, refusing to presume that an agency’s procedural regulations are valid despite administrative law and municipal law doctrines requiring such a presumption. As a result, courts have imposed heavy penalties on public agencies at great taxpayer expense. This Comment argues that courts should presume an agency’s procedural rules adopted for purposes of the PRA are valid as long as they are consistent with the statute’s mandate. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Washington Law Review, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Comment en_US
dc.title [85WashLRev0493] Procedural Rules under Washington’s Public Records Act: The Case for Agency Discretion en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright 2010 by Washington Law Review Association. en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account