Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[6WashJLTech&Arts155] Death of the Spam Wrangler: Can-Spam Private Plaintiffs Required to Show Actual Harm

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lim, Susuk
dc.contributor.author Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
dc.date.accessioned 2010-10-08T21:08:59Z
dc.date.available 2010-10-08T21:08:59Z
dc.date.issued 2010-10
dc.identifier.citation 6 WASH J.L. TECH. & ARTS 155 (2010) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2157-2534
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/480
dc.description.abstract the Ninth Circuit published its first opinion on private plaintiff standing requirements for actions under the federal CAN-SPAM Act. The court strictly interpreted CAN-SPAM’s enforcement language, rejecting attempts by professional litigants to insert themselves into CAN-SPAM’s limited private right of action. This article analyzes Gordon’s treatment of CAN-SPAM’s private right of action and federal preemption provisions. It concludes by assessing the decision’s expected effect on future spam-related litigation. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Litigation en_US
dc.title [6WashJLTech&Arts155] Death of the Spam Wrangler: Can-Spam Private Plaintiffs Required to Show Actual Harm en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright Susuk Lim 2010 en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account