Welcome to the digital.law repository at the University of Washington

[11PacRimLPolyJ795] How Wide Should the Gate of "Technology" Be? Patentability of Business Methods in China

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Xiang, Joy Y.
dc.contributor.author Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal
dc.date.accessioned 2011-02-15T16:51:51Z
dc.date.available 2011-02-15T16:51:51Z
dc.date.issued 2002-06
dc.identifier.citation 11 Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J. 795 (2002) en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1066-8632
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/774
dc.description.abstract Abstract: China regards business methods to be a form of mental activity, and consequently excludes them from patent protection. In recent years, along with the proliferation of computer, telecommunication, and Internet technologies, the line between business methods and technology has blurred. As a result, other patent systems, such as U.S. patent law, have modified or are re-evaluating their patent treatment of business methods. The Chinese patent system is designed to promote the progress of science and technology. Business methods having no technical characters are not technological art. It would thus be overly inclusive to regard every business method as "technology" and therefore patent eligible. Further, broad business method patenting brings more negative impacts than positive influences. Therefore, China should not consider general business methods as patentable subject matter. China may utilize other legal means such as trade secret law, copyright law, and computer software program protection rules to provide legal protection for business methods in general. Nevertheless, as China may want to consider business methods that are integral parts of innovative technical systems as patentable subject matter, high examination standards should be developed to ensure the quality of the patents protecting such business methods. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Seattle: Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, University of Washington School of Law en_US
dc.subject Comment en_US
dc.title [11PacRimLPolyJ795] How Wide Should the Gate of "Technology" Be? Patentability of Business Methods in China en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.rights.holder Copyright 2002 by Pacific Rim Law & Policy Association en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account